
In short. Faridabad is in Haryana, so a central employee posted here, or a pensioner living here, ordinarily files a service case at the Chandigarh Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal. Many Faridabad cases also have a Delhi link, such as an order passed in a Delhi office, and then the Principal Bench at Copernicus Marg can hear them. Choosing between the two is the first decision. A case usually takes one to three years to final order. Start by finding who signed your order, and where.
Is this your situation?
- You work in a central office in the NH-IV area of NIT Faridabad, or another central office in the city, and have a penalty, promotion or pay grievance.
- You live in Faridabad but report to an office in Delhi every day.
- You retired from central service, settled in a Faridabad sector, and your pension, commutation or gratuity is wrong or delayed.
- Your family pension claim as a widow or dependant has been sitting with the PAO for months.
- You applied for a central government job from a Faridabad address and were rejected.
- You have been told to go to Chandigarh but you do not know why, or whether Delhi is possible.
Chandigarh by default, Delhi when Delhi is part of the story
There is no tribunal bench or circuit court in Faridabad. Every district of Haryana is within the Chandigarh Bench's area, which it shares with Punjab, Himachal and the city of Chandigarh itself. Chandigarh is therefore the starting point for anyone serving in Faridabad, and for any retiree whose home is here.
Faridabad is also part of Delhi's daily life. Thousands of central employees live in its sectors and travel to Delhi offices on the Violet Line, and many Faridabad offices take orders from headquarters in Delhi. Rule 6 of the CAT (Procedure) Rules lets a case be filed where the cause of action arose wholly or partly, so a Delhi connection often opens the Principal Bench in New Delhi as well. That is about 30 kilometres away, not 250.
Three questions that settle the bench
- Where are you posted today? If the answer is a Delhi office, the Principal Bench is available to you on that ground alone. If it is Faridabad, Palwal or Ballabgarh, Chandigarh is available.
- Where was the order made, and where did the facts happen? A transfer order issued by a Directorate in Krishi Bhawan or a DPC held in a Delhi ministry is part of the cause of action. That Delhi link can bring the case to the Principal Bench even if you sit in Faridabad.
- Are you still in service? If you have retired, been dismissed or been terminated, Rule 6(2) lets you file at the bench where you ordinarily live. For a Faridabad resident that is Chandigarh, though a Delhi link may still give you the Principal Bench.
Common Faridabad situations and the bench that usually fits
| Your situation | Likely bench | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| Assistant at a CGO Complex directorate, penalty order signed in Faridabad | Chandigarh | Posted in Haryana and the order was made there |
| Same assistant, but the appeal was rejected by the ministry in Delhi | Chandigarh or Principal Bench | Part of the cause of action arose in Delhi |
| Lives in Sector 21, works at a Delhi ministry | Principal Bench | Posted in Delhi; residence does not matter while serving |
| Retired Delhi employee, settled in Greater Faridabad, PPO wrong | Chandigarh (residence) or Principal Bench (order from Delhi PAO) | Rule 6(2) plus where the order came from |
| Postal staff in Faridabad division, transfer within Haryana circle | Chandigarh | Circle office and posting both in the Chandigarh Bench area |
| Candidate from Faridabad rejected by a Delhi-based recruiting body | Usually Principal Bench | Selection decided in Delhi; check for any regional office link |
| NHPC or Indian Oil employee in Faridabad | Not the tribunal | Company staff go to the High Court unless notified |
Rule 6 and the sections that sit behind it
Rule 6(1), CAT (Procedure) Rules, 1987
Your present posting gives you one bench. The place where the decision against you was taken, or any part of the story happened, can give you another. A proviso allows the Chairman to let a case be filed at the Principal Bench in special situations, but Faridabad clients rarely need it.
Rule 6(2)
After you leave service, for whatever reason, the place you now call home also counts. For a pensioner in Sector 15 or Greater Faridabad, that brings in Chandigarh even if every order came from Delhi.
Section 25, Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985
A pending case can be shifted to another bench by the Chairman, either because a party asks or on the Chairman's own motion. Ministries have used this to pull cases to Delhi; employees use it when illness or age makes the original bench too hard to reach. Our page on moving a case under Section 25 explains the test.
Sections 20 and 21
First use your appeal or representation, and wait up to six months for a decision. File within twelve months of the final order, or twelve months after that six-month wait if the appeal is not decided. Late filing needs a separate application for condonation with real reasons.
Central offices in Faridabad that produce service disputes
The NH-IV area of NIT Faridabad, around the CGO Complex, holds several central offices with staff posted all over India. The Central Ground Water Board has its headquarters at Bhujal Bhawan there. The Directorate of Marketing and Inspection, which runs Agmark, has its head office in the CGO Complex, and the Directorate of Plant Protection, Quarantine and Storage is in the same area. Hydrogeologists, chemists, plant protection officers and ministerial staff in these offices bring the usual grievances: transfer to a regional lab far away, an APAR below benchmark, a stalled DPC, recovery after a pay fixation error.
The Department of Posts has a Faridabad postal division, and there are income tax and CGST offices, Kendriya Vidyalayas and CGHS wellness centres in the city. Faridabad also has institutions that are not departments: the National Institute of Financial Management, the ESIC Medical College and Hospital, and the biotech research institutes in the NCR Biotech Science Cluster. Whether their staff can use the tribunal depends on a Section 14(2) notification, not on the fact that the Centre funds them. Our guide on government servants and autonomous body staff explains the difference, and the page on ESIC and EPFO staff deals with that body specifically.
Faridabad workers who go to the High Court instead
Faridabad is an industrial city, and many of its large employers are companies. NHPC has its corporate office in Sector 33 and Indian Oil's R&D centre is in Sector 13. People who work for these companies hold jobs with a corporation, not civil posts. Their remedy is a writ petition in the High Court, unless the company appears in a Section 14(2) notification, which these ones, to our knowledge, do not. The same applies to bank employees. Our page on PSU, bank and CAPF service writs sets out that route.
Haryana government employees, such as teachers in state schools, municipal corporation staff and HSVP employees, are outside the central tribunal altogether. Haryana does not have a functioning State Administrative Tribunal, so their service disputes go to the Punjab and Haryana High Court. If you work for a CAPF unit in the area, the High Court is your forum too.
If you live in Faridabad and work in Delhi
For a serving employee, home does not decide the bench; the posting and the source of the order do. A Faridabad resident working at Nirman Bhawan, a CPWD division in South Delhi or the Delhi postal circle is posted in Delhi, so the Principal Bench is the ordinary forum. Chandigarh is not available just because your house is in Haryana.
That changes on retirement. On the day you superannuate, Rule 6(2) gives you the bench where you live, which for a Faridabad pensioner is Chandigarh. Most retirees with a Delhi pension sanction still have a Delhi cause of action as well, because the PAO, the head of office and the CPAO's processing all sit in Delhi. In practice, many Faridabad retirees prefer the Principal Bench because it is a Metro ride away. Advocate B.K. Singh's view is that the choice should follow the facts, not convenience alone: if the department can argue that no part of the cause of action arose in Delhi, the convenient bench becomes an expensive detour.
Retired in Faridabad: pension cases that come to us most
Faridabad has a large retired population from Delhi's central offices, and the pension problems are familiar. A PPO that does not reflect the last increment, especially for those who retired on 30 June or 31 December and are owed a notional increment for pension. Commutation restored late or not at all. Gratuity held back because of a vigilance file that has not moved in years. Recovery of an old overpayment deducted by the bank from monthly pension.
The law on these is mostly settled; the delay is administrative. A well-documented representation through the head of office often works without litigation. If it does not, an application is filed with the pension papers attached. Interest on delayed gratuity and pension is payable under Rule 65 of the CCS (Pension) Rules, 2021 where the delay is not the pensioner's fault, and an authorised pension cannot be reduced except for a clerical error under Rule 66. Our page on recovery from pension explains when a deduction can be stopped.
Candidates applying from a Faridabad address
Most central recruitment bodies that Faridabad candidates deal with are headquartered in Delhi: the Staff Selection Commission, UPSC, and many ministries' direct recruitment. A rejection by such a body is decided in Delhi, so the Principal Bench is the usual forum. If the selection was run by a regional office in Chandigarh or a Haryana-based unit, the Chandigarh Bench may be the one.
Not every recruitment dispute is before the tribunal. SSC GD constable and CAPF recruitment disputes go to the High Court, mostly the Delhi High Court, because the posts are in the armed police. Check the post first, then the bench.
From the first call to a filed application
For Faridabad clients, the sequence below usually takes three to six weeks from first contact to filing, longer if documents have to be obtained through RTI.
Send the order and your timeline
Share the order you want set aside, your appeal or representation, and a one-page list of dates. A phone photograph is enough to begin; we will need clear copies later.
Online consultation
We go through the facts by video call or at our Dwarka or Vaishali office. The questions are practical: what rule applies, when the limitation period ends, which bench, and whether litigation is worth it at all.
Close the departmental stage
If no appeal or representation has been filed, we draft one and send it through proper channel. If one was filed and six months have passed, we move to the application.
Decide Chandigarh or Delhi
We look at where the order was passed and who decided the appeal. Where both benches are open, we weigh speed of listing, the need for interim relief and your ability to attend.
Draft and file the Original Application
The application is drafted, checked with you line by line, signed and filed, by e-filing or at the registry. The fee is the small fixed amount under Rule 7, with notices served on the respondents.
Hearings and orders
We appear at admission, seek interim relief if needed, and follow the pleadings through to final hearing. When an order comes, we send it to the department and track compliance.
Time and expense, stage by stage
| Stage | Time it typically takes | Money involved |
|---|---|---|
| Waiting on the departmental appeal | Up to six months before the tribunal expects you | Only copying and postage |
| Getting records through RTI | 30 days for a reply, more if a first appeal is needed | Rs 10 per application plus copying charges |
| Drafting and filing | Two to five weeks after documents are in hand | Tribunal fee of Rs 50 under Rule 7 (verify the current amount); our fee, agreed in writing beforehand |
| First listing at Chandigarh or Delhi | Usually a few weeks | Travel to Chandigarh, if you choose to attend in person there |
| Pleadings | Several months; departments often seek extensions | Minor |
| Final hearing and order | One to three years from filing in many cases | Appearance charges as agreed |
| Getting the order carried out | The time the order allows, often three months | A contempt or execution application if ignored |
Papers to gather before we speak
- The order you are challenging, with proof of the date you received it.
- Your appeal or representation, its diary or dispatch number, and any reply.
- Appointment and promotion orders showing your post, pay level and group.
- Service book pages relevant to the dispute, or your e-HRMS service book printout.
- APARs for the last five years, if promotion, MACP or a benchmark is in issue.
- For pensioners: PPO, last pay certificate, pension calculation sheet and bank deduction letters.
- For candidates: advertisement, application, admit card, result and rejection notice.
- Proof of where you live now, if you are a retiree relying on residence for the bench.
Urgent problems: a transfer this week or a recovery this month
Some Faridabad clients cannot wait one to three years. A relieving order that will take effect on Monday, a salary slip showing a recovery of Rs 18,000 a month, or a reversion order cutting pay by two levels needs an interim order, not a final one. Section 24 of the Act lets the tribunal pass interim orders, but only after the respondents have had a chance to be heard or for a short period if the matter is truly urgent. The application must show a strong prima facie case, harm that money cannot later repair, and the balance of convenience.
For transfers, the honest position is that tribunals interfere only where the order breaks the transfer policy, is malicious or ignores a binding guideline, such as the instructions on posting spouses together. A preference for Faridabad schools is understandable but rarely enough. For recoveries, the law is kinder: where you are a Group C employee or a pensioner and the excess was paid for years without any misstatement by you, the tribunal will often stop the deduction while the case is pending. Our pages on interim stay orders and stopping salary recovery explain both in more detail.
If you are already relieved, the transfer case is harder but not over. Join, and keep the challenge going; refusing to join turns a service dispute into a disciplinary one.
What the department usually argues, and how it is answered
Most replies filed by central departments in Faridabad cases follow a familiar pattern. The first argument is limitation: the order is old and the applicant waited too long. The answer lies in your dates, which is why we ask for diary numbers and dispatch receipts on day one. A representation made within time and left undecided for six months gives you a clear starting point under Section 21.
The second argument is jurisdiction: the case should be in Chandigarh, not Delhi, or the reverse. This is answered by the documents that show where the order was signed and where the appeal was decided. The third is that you have not exhausted remedies. That is answered by the appeal itself, or by showing that the order was so plainly beyond the authority's power that an appeal would have been pointless.
Only after these does the reply reach the merits: the rule, the policy, the calculation. A case that survives the first three arguments is usually decided on the documents. Advocate B.K. Singh's habit is to read the department's reply for what it does not deny, because silence on a key fact in a counter affidavit can carry real weight at the final hearing.
A made-up case: a hydrogeologist and his retired neighbour
Here's a made-up example. Arvind, 45, a scientist with a central directorate at the CGO Complex, was transferred to a regional office in Guwahati three months before his daughter's board exams. His request to defer the move was rejected by the headquarters in Faridabad. He is posted in Haryana and the decision was made in Haryana, so his case belonged to the Chandigarh Bench. Because the issue was urgent, the application was filed with a request for interim relief, supported by the transfer policy's provision on mid-session moves and his wife's posting in Delhi.
Here's a second made-up example. Mrs Kapoor, 67, lives two lanes away from Arvind. Her late husband retired from a ministry in Delhi, and her family pension was fixed at a lower rate than she believed was due under Rule 50 of the CCS (Pension) Rules, 2021. She lives in Faridabad, so Chandigarh was open to her under Rule 6(2); the PAO that fixed the pension sits in Delhi, so the Principal Bench was open too. She chose Delhi because she could reach Copernicus Marg by Metro with her son. These examples illustrate how the bench is chosen; they say nothing about how any real case will turn out.
Which High Court hears the challenge
Your choice of bench also fixes your next court. If the case is decided at Chandigarh, whichever side wants to take it further files a writ before two judges of the Punjab and Haryana High Court in Sector 1, Chandigarh. If it is decided at Copernicus Marg, the writ lies in the Delhi High Court on Sher Shah Road. In Alapan Bandyopadhyay (January 2022) the Supreme Court made the point sharply: an order of the Principal Bench is open to scrutiny only in the Delhi High Court, wherever the employee happens to live.
That is one more reason to choose the bench with care. If you think the department will take the case further, you may prefer the High Court you can reach more easily. For writs in Delhi, our sister site on Delhi High Court cases has more.
Getting a Chandigarh case done without living on the highway
Chandigarh is a four to five hour drive from Faridabad, and most applicants do not need to make it. The tribunal accepts e-filing, and benches hear matters by video when the bench permits it. We work with associate counsel at Chandigarh for appearances in person, and the drafting stays with our team. Your presence is rarely needed, except where the bench directs it or a settlement is being discussed.
Where a case at Chandigarh becomes truly unworkable, for example because of an elderly pensioner's health, a transfer request under Section 25 can be made, though it is not granted as a matter of course.
Errors that cost Faridabad applicants months
- Filing in Delhi with no Delhi link. If you are posted in Faridabad and the whole decision was made here, the Principal Bench can return the case. Show the Delhi connection in the application, or file at Chandigarh.
- Treating a company job as a government post. NHPC, Indian Oil and bank staff generally go to the High Court. An application at the tribunal will be returned.
- Letting the year pass. Faridabad applicants often wait for a reply that never comes. The limit is a year from the final order; with an unanswered appeal, add six months of waiting and then a year.
- Skipping the appeal. Going straight to the tribunal without the departmental remedy invites an objection under Section 20 unless the order is plainly illegal.
- Missing documents for a pension claim. A pension case without the PPO, the last pay certificate and the calculation sheet stalls at the first hearing.
When we advise against filing at all
Not every grievance from a Faridabad office belongs in a tribunal. A transfer within the city, from one CGO Complex directorate to a sister office two kilometres away, is unlikely to be disturbed. A grievance about a colleague's behaviour, without any order affecting your service, is better taken to the grievance or internal complaints machinery first. And a claim for promotion when you were not within the zone of consideration, or did not meet the benchmark in your APARs, usually fails unless the APARs themselves can be challenged.
There are also cases where the department is likely to put things right on its own if asked properly. A pension sheet that misses an increment, a CGHS card refused for a missing document, or leave encashment calculated on the wrong number of days are often corrected after one well-drafted letter to the head of office, with the rule quoted and the calculation shown. Filing an application in such cases costs time that a letter might have saved.
The opposite mistake is just as common: a person who has already been told no, in writing, by the final authority, keeps writing letters for two years and then finds the limitation period has expired. A refusal from the final authority is the signal to stop writing and start preparing the application. If you are unsure which side of that line you are on, our guide on the one-year clock may help.
Group A officers, Group C staff, defence civilians and families
Group A officers in Faridabad's directorates usually fight over seniority, promotion and APAR grading, and they often face respondents in Delhi ministries. A Group B or C employee more often brings a transfer, a recovery or a minor penalty. Group C employees have stronger protection against recovery of excess pay under Rafiq Masih (2015), as do pensioners.
Faridabad also has defence civilians and retired defence civilian staff, who use the tribunal like other central employees. Widows and dependants pursuing family pension can file in their own names. Advocate B.K. Singh often tells families that a family pension claim is less about argument than about papers: the death certificate, the marriage record, the nomination forms and the old PPO usually decide it.
What to do before the end of this week
Look at your order and write down three things: who signed it, in which city, and the date you got it. Check whether you have appealed or represented, and when. That gives you both the bench and the deadline. Then gather the papers listed above, even if some are only photocopies.
If you are close to the twelve-month mark, act now; condonation is possible but never certain. For advice on your own papers, or for updates on the bench and the rules, contact Advocate B.K. Singh.
Frequently asked questions
Is there a CAT bench in Faridabad?
No. The tribunal has no bench or circuit sitting in Faridabad. Haryana falls under the Chandigarh Bench, and cases with a Delhi connection can be filed at the Principal Bench in New Delhi.
Can a Faridabad pensioner file at the Principal Bench in Delhi?
You can, provided something that matters happened in Delhi: your pension was sanctioned by a Delhi head of office, say, or wrongly fixed by a PAO there. Without such a link, living in Faridabad points you to Chandigarh. Spell out the Delhi facts in the first pages of the application so the registry does not raise an objection.
I live in Faridabad but my office is in Delhi. Where do I file?
While you are in service, your posting decides it, so the Principal Bench in New Delhi is your ordinary forum. Your Faridabad address does not give you Chandigarh. After retirement, your residence becomes relevant.
Do Haryana government employees go to CAT?
No. The tribunal hears central government and notified bodies' staff. Haryana government employees take service disputes to the Punjab and Haryana High Court, as there is no functioning state administrative tribunal.
Do I need to travel to Chandigarh for my case?
Usually not. Filing can be done online, hearings can often be held by video if the bench permits, and appearances can be handled by counsel. Your presence may be required only if the bench directs it.
How long does a Faridabad service case take?
A first listing often comes within weeks of filing. A final order commonly takes one to three years, depending on the bench, the department's replies and the nature of the case. Urgent matters such as transfers can get interim orders faster.
Can I move my case from Chandigarh to Delhi?
Only by a transfer order of the Chairman under Section 25. It is granted for good reasons such as illness or serious hardship, not simply for convenience. It is better to choose the right bench at the start.
What is the fee to file at CAT for a Faridabad case?
The government fee is nominal: Rule 7 of the procedure rules puts it at Rs 50, though you should confirm the figure in force. What our work costs depends on the case, so we settle it at the first meeting and record it in a letter that breaks it down by stage.